Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

LIFE CARE INFRA TECH LIMITED AND ORS VS SEBI APPEAL NO 346 OF 2016 SAT ORDER DATED JANUARY 9, 2017

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

Date of Decision : 09.01.2017
Misc. Application No. 346 of 2016
In
Appeal No. 91 of 2016

Life Care Infra Tech Limited & Ors. …Applicants

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India …Respondent

Mr. Anant Upadhyay, Advocate with Mr. Vishwas Saraswat, Advocate for the Appellants.

Mr. Rajesh Nagori, Advocate with Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer
Jog Singh, Member
Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member

Per : J.P. Devadhar (Oral)

1.After the appeal was argued for some time, counsel for the applicants sought to withdraw the Misc. Application with liberty to file substantive appeal.

2.Accordingly, the Misc. Application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file substantive appeal with no order as to costs.

Sd/- Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer Sd/- Jog Singh Member Sd/-
Dr. C.K.G. Nair
Member

09.01.2017
Prepared and compared by:
msb

Download Order Copy